Episode Information

WWL: Sheff @ 20
Where We Live - with John Dankosky
Share this Content

In this episode:

The 20th anniversary of the Sheff v. O’Neill lawsuit


Episode Audio

48:57 minutes (23.5 MB)
Download this Episode

It’s been 20 years since the Sheff v. O’Neill lawsuit was filed. The case challenged the entrenched racial isolation in the Hartford Public School system. A 2008 settlement in the case commits the state to expand integrated education options for Hartford's public school children over the next five years-- a process that will require additional state funds and expanded oversight. Meanwhile, critics wonder if the racial integration called for by Sheff is really the key to helping close the achievement gap. On today's Where We Live, as part of a daylong examination of this landmark case, we’ll talk about what’s changed – and what’s stayed the same for the last two decades of education in our region.

On the 15th anniversary of the Sheff vs. O’Neill court case, CPTV produced the following stories for its Main Street program. In the first of these two stories, featured below, you’ll learn how the case helped to implement desegregation in the school system. Those interviewed include: Elizabeth Horton Sheff, Milo Sheff and Theodore Sergi, former CT Commissioner of Education 1994-2003. Then hear from the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, John Britain. He discusses his frustration with the slow pace the state has taken with the issue.

Join the conversation.  Leave comments below.

Related Content:

Related Video

Sounds like the cognitive

Sounds like the cognitive abilities of descendants of non-agri workers needs some assistance also or at least a good American history lesson.  Self-segregation- hogwash!

The cognitive abilities of

The cognitive abilities of these poor descendants of agri-workers will not increase no matter where you attempt to educate them for the greater part.  People segregate themselves then look to the government for solutions.  .