Featured Article

New Agreement Reached in Sheff v. O'Neill
Article Audio

0:59 minutes (0.48 MB)
Download this Article
Share this Content

Elizabeth Horton Sheff - mother of named plaintiff: Photo By Chion WolfElizabeth Horton Sheff - mother of named plaintiff: Photo By Chion WolfA new tentative agreement was reached Friday in the long-running Sheff vs. O’Neill school desegregation case.

Sheff plaintiffs have argued for years that the state’s patchwork approach to the Supreme Court mandate to provide quality, integrated education for Hartford’s schoolchildren has not worked fast enough. And they say the state has never been able to meet the demand of Hartford families. Matthew Colangelo of the NAACP legal defense fund is a member of the Sheff team.

"Under this new agreement…if you’re a parent or a student in the Hartford public schools and you want the opportunity to attend an integrated school, the state has to make that opportunity available to you."

There would be an expansion of the program offering seats in suburban public schools to Hartford’s minority children. Also, more magnet schools would be built in the suburbs. The agreement does not specify costs, but says the state will allocate sufficient resources to implement the goals of the settlement. The agreement requires the approval of Connecticut’s General Assembly.